LenderHawk analysis. Not affiliated with or endorsed by The Permanent Podcast.
This episode lays out how to assemble an effective diligence team for an M&A process, including when to rely on internal operators, when to hire an M&A lawyer, and how an intermediary can help with both market-making and diligence administration. It also covers advisor fee structures, why experienced transaction counsel speeds up closings, and why the seller must remain the decision-maker rather than handing off the deal to advisors.
Business owners, searchers, and buy-side operators who need a practical map for staffing diligence without slowing down a transaction.
A seller-side diligence team usually needs internal operators such as the CFO or controller, plus the CEO or COO when they are meaningfully involved in the business.
An M&A lawyer should be chosen for transaction experience, not general familiarity with the seller, because purchase agreements contain risk allocations and definitions that general practice lawyers often do not handle well.
Bringing counsel in six to twelve months before a planned sale gives time to clean up issues and prepare responses before buyers start asking questions.
An intermediary can serve two separate functions: helping create the market for the deal and helping manage the diligence process as a liaison and data-room coordinator.
Advisor selection should start with fit to the intended exit path; an advisor who mostly sells to strategics or does ESOPs may be the wrong match for a seller seeking a different buyer base.
Fee negotiation matters because percentages often apply to all consideration, not just cash, so an apparently modest fee can be expensive after rollovers or other non-cash components are included.
The business owner remains the decision-maker throughout diligence, and advisors should extend capacity rather than take over the deal.
Experienced transaction counsel improves speed by focusing the parties on the issues that matter most instead of wasting time on lower-value points.
The person or role that coordinates information gathering, manages the data room, and keeps the process moving, while also handling the relationship side of diligence when needed.
When to use: Use when a transaction creates a heavy administrative load and you need one accountable coordinator for the process.
The Lehman formula was described as 5% on the first million, 4% on the second, 3% on the third, 2% on the fourth, and 1% on amounts above that.
The hosts used it as an example of common intermediary fee structures.
Advisory exclusivity periods can run two to three years.
They warned that a long exclusivity period can make a weak advisor expensive even if service quality is poor.
The recommended timeline for involving an M&A lawyer was six to twelve months before going to market.
This was presented as the ideal window for cleaning up issues and preparing diligence materials.
The internal diligence team most often includes the CFO or controller, and also the COO or CEO depending on ownership and operating structure.
They identified the people most likely to be responsible for pulling information and answering diligence requests.
A general business attorney or personal lawyer may not be the right fit for an M&A transaction if they have not handled purchase agreements before.
The hosts contrasted transaction counsel with general practitioners and trust-and-estates lawyers.
Hire an M&A lawyer rather than a general business or personal attorney for a sale process.
Why: Transaction counsel understands purchase agreements, risk definitions, and the pacing of a deal.
Bring legal counsel in months before launch and have them help prepare the diligence package.
Why: Early involvement allows the team to surface issues, clean them up, and present a tidier package to buyers.
Choose an advisor based on the kind of buyer outcomes they actually produce.
Why: An advisor whose market is strategics or ESOPs may not fit a seller pursuing another route.
Negotiate fees with precision around what counts as consideration.
Why: Percentage-based fees may apply to rollover or other non-cash value, not just cash proceeds.
Keep the owner as the final decision-maker and use advisors to extend capacity, not to outsource judgment.
Why: Advisors contribute expertise, but the seller is still the party accountable for business tradeoffs.
Assign one person to manage the data room and diligence requests.
Why: The administrative burden is heavy, and a single coordinator helps keep the business from suffering during the process.
The hosts described the common mistake of bringing a trusted general practitioner or family lawyer into an M&A deal. Their point was that trust does not substitute for transaction experience, and the wrong lawyer can slow the deal and increase costs.
Lesson: Specialized transaction experience matters more than preexisting familiarity when the deal itself is complex.
They pointed out that if counsel is involved six to twelve months in advance, the seller can identify issues early, clean up records, and show buyers a more organized package. That preparation can make the transaction smoother and reduce friction later.
Lesson: Early preparation creates leverage by lowering buyer friction before formal diligence begins.